Solomon's letter...
 

Below when you see pink it is old text and the original answer I gave in my reply. Theblueone is the added text that I recently put in when I posted this letter on this page in order to give furthur explanatin to the reader.
 

Dear Katerina,

"Just surfing the net and found your site. I was particularly interested in the "Ask Katerina" pages as you have billed yourself as the "Dear Abby of the Internet." I hope you don't mind me making some comments.

I wish to say that I am very happy you have tried so hard to help people and I do respect that. I must say, however, I was a bit shocked to see your response to the post on polygamy.

First of all, you are answering from a religious perspective of Christianity. Knowing this, I felt that your answer would probably come from the perspective of Biblical teachings, customs and life without regard to today's culture. (Obviously, modern culture teaches a great many things that are anti-Biblical). I was surprised to find so much of today's cultural influence in your response as opposed to Biblical wisdom. For example, you write:"

>First let's look at Adultery.

Mathew 5: 27,28

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: but I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

"Now, you and I both know that if a person is going to claim to be an authority to the degree that he or she can give Biblical advice, he or she had better know what the Bible is saying.

I'm sure you mean well, but you did not know that the words of Jesus here are not referring to unmarried women, but married women only. The word, "woman" in New Testament context always refers to a woman who is married, not a single woman. Single women are always referred to as "virgins" in the New Testament.

This means that Jesus was telling men not to even imagine lustful things against other men's wives. That meaning is implicit in the Greek word corresponding to 'woman.' "

I Corinthians 6: 9,10

Know you that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God?  Be not deceived neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor abusers of themselves with mankind ...... shall inherit the kingdom of God.   I Corinthians 6: 9,10

"I believe we are in agreement on this scripture, which brings up my next point. Sex between any man and a single women (not when consumating a marriage) is considered fornication, not adultery. Both are sin, but in Old Testament times as well as New Testament times, there was a distinction between the single woman (virgin) and the married woman (woman)."

Hebrew 13:4

Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled; but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

"Agreed again."

Here is where I have a question about Polygamy. If a man is already married and he sees another woman he wants for his wife, is he not looking at her with desire? Is this not considered adultery according to Mathew? He has a wife. He desires another. I beleive the only way to escape this is to marry all the women at once. Because once you marry all others are considered adultery. They are not your wife but another woman. So I feel that when your husband became engaged to you while he had a wife (in the eyes of God) he commited adultery against her according to God's Word.

"Here you are very wrong. When this man desired a single woman (virgin) to be his wife, first of all, he did not necessarily do it for sexual reasons. How can you, not being the man, know he had sexual thoughts about her anyway. But beyond that, she is not a woman. She is a virgin at the time of the engagement. The words of Jesus are not speaking of this.

Your statement that once you marry, all others are considered adultery is not Biblical truth. Nowhere in the Bible is this statement made. It is, however, something our society dictates, but not a Biblical concept. To say that polygamy is a sin based on this scripture would be wrong."

Genesis 2: 21,11,21,24

Now the subject of one wife. And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up theflesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This [is] now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

"I believe the part of this passage you are focussing is probably "they shall be one flesh". You must know if you have studied Hebrew that this passage is not talking about some mystical, soulish union, but the act of sex. It means that a man and wife will have sex."

Deuteronomy 17:17

Neither shall he multiply wives for himself, let his heart turn away;

"A very dangerous thing that Solomon did. He multiplied wives unto himself to the point that his wives and concubines numbered close to 1,000. You and I both know what happened. His pagan wives convinced him to build temples to their Gods.

However, the rest of that passage also tells us that a king should not multiply to himself money or horses.

Hmm, now, how many dollars are the limit? 1? How many horses are the limit? 1?"

I am glad to see you lump your wives in the same catagory of dollars and horses. As a female I would find this most alarming if my husband found me equal to such commodities. I would hope I would be worth more to him as his wife and as one who shares his life and his bed.

"No. Of course not. We know that a king should have many horses and much in riches if he is to carry out the kingdom's business. More than one, but not excessive. David's many wives were not an excess. God himself testified that He had given David wives (plural).

Now, if more than one was not excessive, than just having more than one wife is not a problem. Furthermore, if God gave David multiple wives, He approved of polygamy."

Again, you refer to Old Testament times throughout all of this letter. Where is Jesus?

Leviticus 18:18

Neither shall you take a woman as a rival to her sister, to uncover her nakedness while the other is alive.

"Here you are proving that polygamy is acceptable, for in the Law is showing that although polygamy is acceptable, a man must not take sisters in order to vex his first wife."

Here you have totally misinterpreted the passage. Often fellow human beings were referred to as brothers and sisters in these times. This passage saying not to take a sister as a rival means not to take her as another wife. And if you feel I am wrong on this point, then how about "to uncover her nakedness while the other is alive" ? I believe there is only one way to translate this. It is simple. Do not have sex with any other woman while you have a living wife. Period.

"Other places in the law also have rules for polygamy. God's law proves He approves of it."

I Timothy 3:2

Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable,hospitable, able to teach.

"You must be using the NIV Bible here, which admittedly takes liberties to write what the translators felt the author "meant to say."

No, I use the King James Version.

"In reality, the passage reads in the Greek, "the husband of the first wife." The word "mia" meaning "first" is used by the Apostle Paul, not the word "heis" which means "one." The NIV translators took a liberty to fit our modern culture, not the truth of the Bible.

It would have been very easy for Paul to outlaw polygamy here, but he did not."

He did not approve it either. I believe he mentions absolutely nothing about it. At least I have yet to see it. I have read the entire Bible.

"What the apostle Paul was saying is that a man must be married to be a bishop or elder. That way, the pastor could look into his home and determine whether or not he was a good manager. A single man had not proven himself by managing a family and thus was not fit to manage the house of God. I'm sure if you study the entire passage, you will agree."

Yes a man must be married and be of one wife! It is very specific here. It says beyond any doubt that an Elder and a Biship must have only ONE wife. You conviently omitted this.

.

"Furthermore, if he had said exactly what the NIV translators would like us all to believe, he would be condoning polygamy among non-elders and non-bishops. It would also indicate that both Timothy and Titus were considering polygamists for these posts, indicating that they were accepted as Christians."

No. God says Elders and Bishops are to set an example for us to follow. And he says we should mold our Holiness after Jesus and their example of living. He does not give permission for us to live in Plural Marriages simply because the lay people are not mentioned. How can one live a chaste, clean life if the ones who head our Churches are not Holy? If the Church leaders do not do their best to live a life of Holiness then it is not a church of our Lord they are head of..I would venture to say it is more of the Satanic persuasion.

Mathew 19:9

I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery.

"I agree, replacing a wife is a sin. No woman should feel she has been replaced as serial monogamy does. It would have been so easy here for Jesus to say, "And a man who takes an additional wife commits adultery" but He did not. In fact, no where in the Bible is polygamy said to be a sin, yet the Bible meticulously categorizes all kinds of sexual sin.

If God did not want us to do it, He would have said so."

Again wrong. He does not condone it either. Granted, there is alot about Him in the Old Testament and such things. But I still see nothing that says it is good for a man to have more than one wife. Actually I have seen where it is not good.

Gensis 2:18

The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him." (Notice a "helper" not "helpers." )

"And then later, God gave wives (notice the plurality) to David."

"Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,' and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'. So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate. Mathew 19:4

"Here, the book of Matthew quotes an old testament scripture referring to sexual union. The original passage in the Old Testament, as well as the passage from Genesis above was written by Moses, who had a wife from Midian and a wife from Ethiopia and gave the law to God's people without any ban on polygyny."

If you are saying that this means the sexual union then the passage means a man is to have sex with only one woman. Which would mean if a plural marriage is to be Holy the husband cannot have sex with more than one of the wives for all of them would be one flesh.

I found many passages in the Old Testament that states men of that time period had many wives. I also believe this was the way of the land and not God's way.

"What causes you to believe that it was the way of the land and not God's way? Every other time anything was the way of the land, but not God's way, He forbade it. Why not polygamy?"

I saw nothing where God said specificly that a man is permitted to have more than one wife. Quite the contrary.

"Katerina, God told David he had given him "wives", than said he would have given him "more", but David sinned by taking the wife of a married man. Furthermore, in the Old Testament, God likens Himself to being a Bigamist having two wives, Israel and Judah. God would NEVER portray himself as a sinner."

You have blasphemed our Lord. Calling him a Bigamist. A Bigamist is a criminal. He was referring to "land" not women. Many lands were referred to as "wives" describing them as terms of endearment.

Referring to an early quote..would you give a man your daughter to have sex with her rather than have sex with him yourself if he visits your house and he has sexual desires? This is scriptural. If you follow the Old Testament in it's entirety then you would do this and it would be right. Is it right? Would you cause your daughter to loose her virgintiy to a "guest"? Is everything in the Old Testament valid law which holds true today? If it is, again then you do not follow Jesus. In the Old Testament Jesus has not come yet. The New Testament is "in addition to" the Old Testament. The fact that Jesus came and exists in the New Testament cancells us waiting for the Messiah that God promised in the Old Testament. So you see Jesus did change some of the Old Testament beliefs. He clarified many issues of the Old Testament. Adultery is one of them. Monogamous marriages is another. Those of you who do not follow the teaching of Jesus and prefer to live in Old Testament times are not believing that Jesus is who he said he was.

Jesus came not to change God's Law but to elaborate on it and make it more understandable.

"No, He came to fulfill it."

If He came to fulfill it then why does he require us to not look upon another with lust? Why does he say this is adultery? Why does he require church officials to have only one wife?

The seventh Commandment God gave to Moses on the mountain said: Thou shalt not commit adultery. Jesus went farther with it. (see scripture above)

"Yes, but he never said polygamy was wrong."

He also never said it was right or "lawful".

The laws of the land were in progress long before the Ten Commendments were given to us. Therefore the laws remained in tact.The Ten Commandments, being new I believe took a while to become the law of Jewish Religion.

"Where did you get this. They were laws that were enforced immediately after Moses came down from the mountain. There is NO evidence that they took time to be law."

Yes the laws were enforced. But many rebelled and refused to listen and follow them. Why do you think God destroyed Sodom and Gomorah? The land was perverse. Do you think they were abiding by the Ten Commandments that were put into effect?

Many rebelled against them. Also there are many instances were God comdems many immoral actions such in the time of Sodom and Gamorah. He destroyed the city because it became corrupt. God also destroyed the Earth because it became totally corrupt and the only way to rid this planet of the evil that spread throughout was to completely destroy the inhabitants. And so He did.

"Sure, we agree on this, but this had nothing to do with polygamy."

I have meditated deeply on this. When I receive Divine Guidence I take this to mean for me and not all mankind. The Holy Spirit and I are the ones in converstation and I am listening. Here is what I received. I must only take one husband. I must serve him well as his wife. I must not partake in any adulterous relationships. If I marry a man who asks me to commit adultery I must leave him and be unmarried. He is not a man of God. I must only be yoked to a man of God who has the virtues of the Lord. He will guide me in the ways that God would. I am only permitted to a man who is not an adulterer as well

"I agree on all you say her, but so far, it has nothing to do with polygamy."

and if he looks at any other woman as anything other than a father or brother or friend I again must be unmarried. I must not be yoked to an adulterer. Remember, this was give to me for me. So I am not saying this for all mankind.

"I'm assuming you are saying that if your husband looks at another as a potential wife, he is an adulterer."

Yes I am saying this.

"Here what you are saying directly contradicts God's Word. It could not be the Holy Spirit Who is speaking to you. Furthermore, to leave your husband because he took another wife would be adultery unless as the law allows, he has diminished your food, shelter, etc."

It would be adultery since he would looked upon another woman with lust in his heart while he has a wife.God gives the Believer pemission to remarry under such circumstances. If you are a man of God you should already know this.

"Ah, but you ARE saying this for all mankind and not yourself because you say that "your" husband would be an adulterer if he had another wife. This affects others beside you."

Correct. Are you saying what you are doing is not affecting others? What about the children who are growing up in your environment? They will continue in an adutlerous lifestyle as well.

You must decided what is right for you and of God. You asked for my thoughts on this subject and here they are. I certainly hope I did not make an enemy of you. I make many with the scriptures. But so be it.

"Of course I gave you my thoughts without being asked, but I certainly hope I have not made an enemy either. I have only spoken the truth of God's Word. The truth is, polygamy was not "made" a sin by the church until 600 or 700 A.D. (about the time Islam took off). It was done by the Roman Catholics who were infused by Roman (hence theRomance) ideology that was opposed to polygamy. It was cultural, not spiritual."

Let me quote you if I may, "polygamy was not "made" a sin by the church until 600 or 700 A.D. (about the time Islam took off)." You said it yourself. Polygamy was opposed by the Church.So those living in a polygamous relationship were living in sin according to the Chruch.. Jesus gave Peter the keys to heaven. And He said "whatsoever thou makest as law on earth will be bound in heaven." The Catholics say St. Peter was the first Pope. Peter was the first in authority after Jesus. The church he continued on with does not honor polyamy ( many believe it was the Orthodox Catholic Church). You just answered your own question as to whether it was legal in the church
or not.

Matthew 16: 17,18   (Jesus speaking)

"And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and 'the gates of Hades' shall not prevail against it. And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven."

Heed the word of o>

Transfer interrupted!

"Therefore, anyone living polygamous lives today is not in sin as long as their family is polygynous and not involved in polyandry."

Modern day polygamy is a sin.

"Furthermore, not all states have outlawed polygamy and all states will allow and recognize a marriage so long as it is legal where it is carried out."

Alot of states also do not recognize God. They have removed Him from public schools. And they have removed the "freedom of religion" in many respects from their laws as well. Yet they allow guns and knives to enter schools and lives to be taken by children who are out of control. Children who have no parental supervision or guidence.

"Furthermore, the government decided that polygamy laws were unenforceable in the 1940s. In 1996, the supreme court decided that polygamy would have to be granted recognition and rights in the US."

The courts are also trying to pass equal rights for Gays in the military. And Gay marriages. And they are also trying to take Social Security at an all time low. The are also trying to erradictate a woman's right to make choices over her own body. So, you see our land is perverse. Our courts tend to follow the concensus of the general population since this is what gets votes rather than God's way since this is not what gets votes. So you are out to lunch here.

"I do not want you to have a polygamous family, nor do I think it should be the goal of all men, however, it is clear that God is not opposed to it. I just hope you will overcome your cultural bias and respect this as a godly lifestyle in the future."

I cannot respect anything as being "from God" that is not totally lived in accordance of God. This would not be a religion of God but the religion of a Cult.

Sincerely yours,

Solomon

Update:

This was posted on Solom's website. (Without my reply below included) In all due
respect I found the rest of the page quite irrevelent and this would not appear here but I
do not want anyone led into the darkness and away from God such as Satan always
tries to do with those who profess our Lord.

"Katerina, why are you lying to your readers. This passage is obviusly NOT from the King James Version, which reads:"

The exact version I use:   THE NEW KING JAMES VERSION. I believe this is a King James Version? yes? I am sure you will say no. Do you see "King James" in the title? I am sure you will still swear it is invalid.

"No I am not a blesphemer. You use this convenient tactic to ignore what I said. Besides, I used the word "likened" which is exactly what God did. I never called God a bigamist. Where did you read that? Why would God use this language (even if describing land) if it were immoral? Simple: He would not. God does not consider polygamy immoral and thus does not prtray himself as a sinner."

I believe "likened" means the "same as" or "simular". Yes, you blasphemed our Lord.

There will be no more correspondence with Solomon. May God be merciful on you, Solomon,
and your household. I will pray for you. Amen.

Second Update:

On September 16th I visited the website of Solomon. Below is what I found. I was astounded
to see the accusations I found below. He told me in an email he preferred to not email me
anymore yet he says I stopped communication. He calls me a liar yet I noticed on his page last week when I visited it that his counter regestered only a few hundred visitors. He informed me he had only had the page a few weeks. Today I noticed, in only one short week that his counter has jumped to 144,446! Amazing! I believe even Mr. Starr's counter has not moved like this on the Presidential Report of President Clinton which has the traffic the the United States. There can be only one conclusion. He has nothing to do but sit at his website all day and hit the reload button. Or has his wives lined up with their own computers. More propaganda. Also compare our corres- pondence on his page to the correspondence on this page. You will find it greatly altared by Mr. Plural. Alot of my email was deleted and his was changed. This is what others do when they fail and must make their winning opponent look like the looser. Anyone who cares to see the email and the date where Solomon tells me he wishes to have no further contact with me just email me and I will forward it to you. Although I am sure you will not find it important enough. Oh you might be interested in knowing, incase you have a problem or a marriage question Solomn now has an "Ask Solomon" page...hehehehe. I can't wait to follow it. He now says I call him a blasphemer, which I do but he places himself in the company of Jesus. So now he not only called God a bigamist but Jesus a blasphemer. This is getting very old Solomon. You may continue trying to deflate me as a Christian if you like. It wont work. Put all the lies and insults you would like on your satanic website. I stand firm. Folks, we need to move onto more important issues and more important people.... ..those with real needs and who do not try to inflate there defeated egos by trying to take my time from those in need. This is a closed chapter. Solomon has gotten way to much attention as it is. No further updates no matter what propaganda he chooses to put on this site.

God Bless you all :)

"Here is an e-mail I sent to Katerina of First Angel, a website where she gives advice to readers. She gave advice to a reader regarding polygamy, so I sent the following e-mail. She had previously included a link to my site on her meager posting of the debate, but lately has removed it since I have embarrassed her so badly by exposing her lies, bad logic and inability to understand the Bible. Furthermore, she calls me a blasphemer now, which puts me in the wonderful company of Jesus and her into the company of those who crucified him. She's refused to have any contact with us anymore, but she has yet to repent of her lies.

My first Letter to Katerina Katerina's reply and my rebuttal (This is hot!)

Since I so soundly defeated Katerina's attack on God's patriarchal order, no one has dared to debate me regarding polygamy. However, I welcome all comers."
 

End of Solomon.
 

Posted date:                                                                                       Date of Letter:
September 4, 1998                                                                            September 1, 1998

Subject:  Plural Marriages

Hi Katerina,

"I have been a fan of your web site for some time and I feel that you have a great insight and wisdom. You have helped many people and I pray God will bless you for your efforts. I am a born again Christian as well and I would like to see how you feel about the lifestyle God has given my family and I. When I was 19 years old I became engaged and married to a man who already had a wife under the law of God (there was no certificate of marriage). I am now a part of their family and his first wife and I have become like sisters. We live a normal life and although we have faced much opposition from those who don't agree or understand the lifestyle that God has given us, we are happy with our lives and never regret the way we live. We are all spiritually minded and have strong relationships with the Lord and through different changes of events we were all shown that this was the will of God.

I urge you to check out the Christian polygamy sites on the web before you answer. I don't know your views on this subject but there are others out there whom God has spoken the same thing to. I also urge you to read up on this topic in the word, you may be surprised at what you find. Particularly in the life of King David.

Thank you Katerina. I look forward to your response."

A Second Wife

Dear Sister,

I was very happy to get your letter. I hope that you and your family are well. Although I must admit you left me kind of baffled. I have never been approached with this subject before. Because I wanted to give you the answer that the Holy Spirit has given to me I did much reasearch and meditation on this issue. My intention before we begin is not to offend nor make a sister fall. And most certainly I say these things in kindness. I am only human. So below find God's Words and mine. Keep in mind God's Words are Law. Mine are simply that, my opinion. I suggest you search your heart and let the Holy Spirit be your guide in making decisions of the heart (or anything else). Ok here we go.

First let's look at Adultery.

Mathew 5:27,28

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: but I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

1Cor. 6:9,10

Know you that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God?  Be not deceived neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor abusers of themselves with mankind
......shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Hebrews 13:4

Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled; but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

Here is where I have a question about Polygamy. If a man is already married and he sees another woman he wants for his wife, is he not looking at her with desire? Is this not considered adultery according to Mathew? He has a wife. He desires another. I beleive the only way to escape this is to marry all the women at once. Because once you marry all others are considered adultery.

Now the subject of one wife.

And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This [is] now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Deu. 17:17

Neither shall he multiply wives for himself, let his heart turn away;

Lev. 18:18

Neither shall you take a woman as a rival to her sister, to uncover her nakedness while the other is alive.

1Timothy 3:2

Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but ONE WIFE, temperate, self-controlled,
respectable, hospitalbe, able to teach.

Mathew 19:9

I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another
woman commits adultery.

Genesis 2:18

The Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him"
(Notice "helper" [one, singular] not "helpers"

Mathew 19:4
 

"Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,' and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'. So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.

I found many passages in the Old Testament that states men of that time period had many wives. I also believe this was the way of the land and not God's way. I saw nothing where God said specificly that a man is permitted to have more than one wife. Quite the contrary. Jesus came not to change God's Law but to elaborate on it and make it more understandable. The seventh Commandment God gave to Moses on the mountain said: Thou shalt not commit adultery. Jesus went farther with it. (see scripture above) The laws of the land were in progress long before the Ten Commendments were given to us. Therefore the laws remained in tact.The Ten Commandments, being new I believe took a while to become the law of Jewish Religion. Many rebelled against them. Also there are many instances were God comdems many immoral actions such in the time of Sodom and Gamorahh. He destroyed the city because it became corrupt. God also destroyed the Earth because it became totally corrupt and the only way to rid this planet of the evil that spread throughout was to completely destroy the inhabitants, and so He did.

With this I will end. You are my sister. I am glad you wrote to me. Please write again. I am always here for you and will do my best to answer you. I know God will Bless you because I believe your heart is right.

Your sister,
Katerina
 

                                                          Conclusion
 

Polygamy is against the law. It is called Bigamy and punishable by our laws of today. I believe God prefers us to not break the laws. I believe God feels as His children we are to uphold the laws and abide by them as if they were His laws. How can one say breaking the law is of God? I believe Polygamy today is that of Cults that have evolved in our times.The Church Jesus established strongly abhorrs polygamny. Evidence is above. Our world is headed for a major change. These false churches with their false doctrines and their false prophets will crumble. Prepare for a new awakening. The original church of our Lord God is about to emerge. There are many churches who have twisted God's law to suit their purposes. These are the very churches that will crumble under God's rule. Certain churches use the Bible to intimidate and control others. This is not God's way.
 

To all you men out there I say this. Love your wife and family only second to God. Be head of your household as Christ is head of the Church. If you do not, then you serve not the Lord. Provide a wholesome, stable, Godly environment for your children. Give much discipline and even more love. Our God is love. Satan is hate and discord and the great deceiver. His end will come. We will all be held accountable for our actions. "Judge not lest ye be judged". Any man who uses God's Word to accomplish that which his own heart desires instead of what God desires will be accountable for all he is in control of in his household. To you women..love your husband. Honor him, be submissive to him and be his "helper". If you are choosing someone you cannot honor or be submissive to then you are choosing the wrong man for your husband. And any man who would suggest that you live in a relationship that is anything other than Godly is the wrong one also. It is very important to choose wisely when consenting to becoming someone's wife. It not only involves the rest of your life but the future of your children.

There is much turmoil in the world. The world is becoming very corrupt as in old times. There has to be a change. God says there will be a change. Jesus will come and claim his church. It is coming soon.

                                                            God be with you.
 
 

A Few Links:

Steve Butt of Bfree A prime example of how someone uses Jesus Christ for satanic purposes.
When you get to his site click "enter" then "about us". The first letter on the previous page of our website is from "one" of his wives.

Solomon's Website  To our knowledge Solomon no longer has a website. A major portion of the debate on this site is with Solomon. He is another advocate of multiple marital partners in the name of the Lord, like Steve Butt. .

A look at Joseph Smith, founder, Mormon Church

Polygamy Victim's find Their Voice

Is Polygamy allowed in the New Testament?

A Chronology of Federal Legislation on Polygamy

Anti-Polygamy

Who will make the difference for our children?

Polygamy FAQ

Newsweek Article....08/10/1998 - Child Raped

Tapestry

Legalities, 3 Coins

Statement of Gov. Mike Leavitt of Utah on Polygamy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Anyone who has a website to contribute please email it to me. You will find an email on the first page. I will be adding more as I am still researching the net. I hope you have become well informed of the Cults and destruction that is going on with innocent people in the world today. Go in peace! Walk in the truth!